Methodology

How StackSane turns product facts into a useful decision.

We separate research, fit and commercial relationships so a higher commission cannot become a better recommendation.

01

Start with the workflow

We define the operating problem first: stages, ownership, handoffs, reminders, reporting, collaboration and the cost of administration.

02

Verify material facts

Prices, plan limits, capabilities and important constraints need sufficiently current evidence before they can influence a recommendation.

03

Test fit and trade-offs

We compare what the software solves against what it adds: setup, recurring data hygiene, migration effort, lock-in and reversibility.

04

Allow “buy nothing”

Keeping a spreadsheet or improving the process first remains a first-class result whenever new software would add more work than value.

05

Keep affiliate economics separate

Commercial terms are evaluated only after product fit. Commission size, cookie duration and payout economics do not change recommendation order.

06

Remove claims that age badly

If evidence becomes stale, conflicting or incomplete, the affected claim is held back until it can be re-verified.

What we do not claim

  • No universal “best software” when needs differ.
  • No guaranteed savings or business outcome.
  • No assumption that an export equals a lossless migration.
  • No paid placement inside the product-fit score.